I suspect a good bit of the subjective sound quality differences people here between computer hardware come from the vast quality difference in the output circuits. The cache misses are where the real latency spikes are at, and those are being delivered by RAM. I look at the max transfer rate between RAM and the caches before I care about the 元 size itself. Some of AMD's chips with a positively giant 元 cache have terrible latency, because they added it trying to make up for deficiencies in the ram元 interface of the hardware. That by itself certainly doesn't cause the difference. Picking that one thing as the important one out of the latency processing pipeline has to be a correlation only error for the subset they looked at.
Intel tends to put the most 元 Unified cache into its most powerful processors. If I recall correctly, he said the larger the 元 cache, the better the sound, because there is less jitter from latency.
0 kommentar(er)
